The GPL and GFDL are not the same license they are only connected through the Free Software Foundation, the creator of the licenses. This means that the interface design of Wikipedia and all other portions of the MediaWiki software are licensed under the GPL, but the actual contents of Wikipedia are licensed under the GFDL.Īs such, portions of this screenshot may be licensed under two separate licenses.
Note on licenses: Please note that the GPL is for software and its derivatives and the GFDL is for text documentations or other forms of text and their derivatives. Logos (if they appear in this screenshot) of the Wikimedia Foundation are Wikimedia trademarks and are subject to Trademark policy. The mediawiki software itself is licensed under the GNU General Public License.Īny other media in this image may be subject to other terms. Text of Wikimedia projects (except for Wikinews and parts of Wikidata ) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 license and may additionally be licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License (Version 1.2, 1.3, or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts), and are subject to terms of use.
“Right now, the article gives both that definition and the NBER definition, and takes no position on which is ‘correct.This is a screenshot of a web page of a Wikimedia Foundation project. “As far as I can tell, nobody ever messed with this,” JPxG said. He added that the article has included that part of the definition since 2011. The editor discredited rumors that Wikipedia had removed mention of two quarters of negative GDP growth from its recession definition and said any screenshots implying so are outdated. One volunteer editor who works under the user name JPxG addressed the censorship concerns in an FAQ on the forum. “That doesn’t sound like a recession to me,” he said.Īlthough the actual recession Wikipedia page has been partially locked, editors have created a separate recession talk page for users to discuss improvements. is in a recession, and instead touted continued job growth, low unemployment and growing investment from manufacturers. On Thursday, after GDP data was released, Biden rejected the idea that the U.S. On social media, people accused the recession Wikipedia page of trying to erase that popular definition to align itself with President Biden. One user added the line: “There is no global consensus on the definition of a recession,” which someone else later removed for seeming “too vague.” Other edits disagreed on whether to place a popular definition for a recession-two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth-higher in the article or further down.
WIKIPEDIA SCREENSHOT EDITOR HOW TO
Wikipedia’s history of the page shows that most edits have gone back and forth about how to define a recession. A raster graphics editor is a computer program that allows users to create and edit images interactively on the computer screen and save them in one of many raster graphics file formats (also known as bitmap images) such as JPEG, PNG, and GIF. Volunteer editors know this, and have created tools and mechanisms for responding to an influx of edits on articles that are in the public eye,” a spokesperson for the foundation said. “Protecting an article is one common tool they use.” A screenshot from the GIMP raster graphics editor. Google has many special features to help you find exactly what youre looking. “It’s not uncommon for topics in the news to receive sudden interest on Wikipedia. Search the worlds information, including webpages, images, videos and more. The Wikimedia Foundation, a nonprofit that operates Wikipedia, told Fortune that volunteer editors-rather than any central body-control site content “using established policies around neutrality, reliable sourcing, and notability, among others, as the basis for those decisions.” The change even appeared to catch the attention of Elon Musk, who tagged Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales in a tweet, writing: “Wikipedia is losing its objectivity.”